. Furthermore, this would result in local courts judging United Nations listings based on criminal standards of evidence, despite the fact that the List is not a criminal list. Res. 794 (1992), SC Res. Moreover, an independent, impartial, and effective review mechanism should be established and the measures taken should be regularly reviewed by the SC, the frequency of such reviews depending on the rights and interests involved. 16.Report of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Counter-Terrorism Committee Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), S/2001/1253, at 9; Report of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to the Committee Established Pursuant to Paragraph 6 of Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), S/2002/6, at 4; Report on Counter-Terrorism submitted by Switzerland to the Security Council Committee Established Pursuant to Resolution 1373 (2001), S/2001/1224, at 5.See the Report of the Counter-Terrorism Committee to the Security Council for Its Consideration as Part of Its Comprehensive Review of the Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate, UN Doc. 1.Supplementary Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee Pursuant to Paragraph 6 of Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), S/2003/266, at 4; Information Provided by the Russian Federation in Response to the Additional Questions and Observations Prepared by the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the Security Council in Connection with the Supplementary Report of the Russian Federation Submitted in Accordance with Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), S/2003/839, at 6.‘A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility’, Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, New York, 2004 (UN Doc.
The establishment of the United Nations at the end of the Second World War in 1945 was a welcome development after the failure of the League of Nations to ensure the protection of international peace and security. It would also mean that local judges could secondguess the decision of the Committee based on their own reviews of the evidence, which may or may not be the same evidence as that presented to the Committee (because the evidence given to the Committee is generally confidential). In the context of the Council of Europe see ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, Due Process and United Nations Security Council Counter-Terrorism Sanctions’, Report prepared by Professor Iain Cameron (6 Feb. 2006).Report of the Principality of Andorra Pursuant to Paragraphs 6 and 12 of Security Council Resolution 1455 (2003) S/AC.37/2004/(1455)/35, at 5; Report of Croatia on the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1455 (2003), S/AC.37/2003/(1455)/33, at para. 1173 and 1176 (1998).See SC Res. 1546 (para. S/AC.37/2003/(1455)/40, at 9; Updated Report of Turkey on Steps Taken to Implement the Measures Imposed by Paragraph 4 (b) of Resolution 1267 (1999), Paragraph 8 of Resolution 1333 (2001) and Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Resolution 1390 (2002), S/AC.37/2003/(1455)/6, at 4; Report of Pakistan to the 1267 Committee on Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1455 (2003), S/AC.37/2003/(1455)/35, at 4.In fact, the SC’s exercise of powers under Chapter VII is the only available means of promptly producing general law.