Nestlé, the world's largest food and beverage company, is committed to enhancing quality of life and contributing to a healthier future. Water Grabs.
3K likes. Given the fact that Nestle continues to act beyond the boundaries of ecological protection and basic human dignity, the Lakota People’s Law Project asks the public to consider taking our Nestle Pledge and commit to boycotting Nestle’s products.In order to profit off of water, first, one must own the rights to it. In the 1970s, declining rates of breastfeeding led a number of organisations to raise concerns about the marketing practices of breast milk substitute manufacturers - including Nestlé - in developing countries. Nestlé is the largest of the baby milk companies. Mislabeled Products. It belongs to the people and it belongs to the ecosystem,” says Peggy Case, president of Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation—one of several groups fighting Nestle bottling in the state.547 South 7th Street #149 Bismarck, ND 58504-5859Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date with what we're working on.Through its inquiry, the Water Board determined that between 1947 and 2015, Nestle pumped an average of 62.6 million gallons per year from the San Bernardino National Forest.During that same time, the Forest Service suffered from budget cuts resulting in a backlog of permits up for renewal. Nestlé UK Product List.
Nestle’s complicity in deforestation has displaced both people and animals native to the rainforests that are cleared for palm oil cultivation. Nestle, the largest food and bottled water company in the world and has several reasons to boycott: Bottle Water. Meanwhile, Nestle makes billions of dollars in profit from the water it pumps from nearby Evart, MI, for just a shocking $200 a year. There is a report on own brand cereals manufactured by Nestlé’s Cereal Partners business in Boycott News 32. Thus, water, as lobbied by Nestle, is not merely a commodity — but a luxury good sold in a market dominated by Nestle.As a large market force seeking cheap palm oil, Nestle’s presence encourages these unsustainable and unethical practices. [citation needed] One major issue is passing out free powdered formula samples to mothers in hospitals. The boycott has been cancelled and renewed because of the business practices of Nestlé and other substitute manufacturers monitored by the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN). At this pace, communities will not have enough for their future needs. Nestle buys freshwater sources, such as aquifers, and resells it for an immense profit.As is typically the case with transnational capitalism, indigenous people in countries that produce large amounts of palm oil — like Indonesia and Malaysia — are pushed out of their traditional homelands to make way for production of this profitable commodity. The company’s habitual depletion of water from numerous sites across the globe, including California and Michigan, all too often leads to environmental damage and health risks for surrounding regions and communities. ONE MILLION COFFEE DRINKERS TO BOYCOTT STARBUCKS FOR PARTNERING WITH NESTLÉ. Baby Formula. In the 1970s, declining rates of breastfeeding led a number of organisations to raise concerns about the marketing practices of breast milk substitute manufacturers - including Nestlé - in developing countries. It's unclear when Nestle itself began bottling water, but the Poland Spring brand it owns has been bottled since 1845. On the 28th of August 2018, Starbucks signed a $7.1 billion dollar deal with Nestlé. The egregious corporate behavior of Nestle in regards to water rights only compounds the company’s historical environmental and human rights violations. The nestle boycott is something I’ve been passionate about for years…probably 20 plus years! See factbox for further details. The company did not respond to specific questions about the new study but a Nestlé spokesperson told the Guardian it supported WHO recommendations and believed that breastmilk was, wherever possible, “the ideal source of nutrition for babies.”In South Africa, the firm used sucrose in infant milk formulas, while marketing its Brazilian and Hong Kong formulas as being free of sucrose “for baby’s good health”.Exclusive: Report finds Swiss multinational is violating advertising codes and misleading consumers with nutritional claims“If the science is clear that an ingredient is safe and beneficial for babies then such ingredients should be in all products.