I shoot digital and am just now branching into the film world and this was very helpful!As a slower film with an ISO of 200, Kodak Gold looks best with plenty of good light. Kodak Gold is surely one of those that command it in a way some others can’t. It also renders skin tones beautifully.Try rating between 160-200 and metered for the shadows or midtones. But sometimes i was disappointed about the fading colors in some conditions. If you are attracted to saturated colors with more contrast as I am, Fuji Superia may be your choice. Does one shine for you under certain conditions and for certain subjects? The photographic films and cameras used…I noticed a few differences. According to Kodak specs, Gold 200 can be overexposed three stops and underexposed two stops and still produce a decent image!
I find the Kodak 200 and 400 to be a little more grainier than their Superia counterparts at 200 and 400 respectively. I can see myself using something cooler should I ever do a one-film colour street project. Overall though, it really does perform well in a variety of lighting situations, especially those with a lot of contrast.Since its ISO is 200, it’s considered a rather slow film, so you’ll need good light when using it.
So, don’t get gypped out those eight exposures!Hi! Color negative film can handle overexposure quite well–some up to 3-4 stops. The budget brothers. I’m not sure I do but if you’re okay with it, I don’t see much else that will cause any big issues.There’s always going to be nostalgia in analogue photography. I have 2 of them just to perform little tests like this. The consumer film cousins.All of the above is still true. Finally, does anything you see here make you want to switch? I’d love to hear your thoughts. You never know, Gold overexposed one stop could be much better than the Fuji 200 shot at box speed or vice versa.C200 is superb stuff .
Sometimes the rare E100 Ektachrome pops up. Kodak Gold 200 is a consumer-grade film, meaning it’s cheap, readily available, and really hard to mess up. This is why it’s also great for beginners. Second, I also believe it has a more greenish bluish cast. The colours, the contrast, the balcks & whites: everything is on it’s place. If it’s not in your film repertoire, grab some the next time you’re at the drug store, and give it a try!Kodak Gold 200 is a consumer-grade film, meaning it’s cheap, readily available, and really hard to mess up.It’s got a wide latitude and rich color saturation as well. Now as i know that fuji is that great i have to get some. Will have to give it a try.I shot Kodak Gold 200 exclusive, because its available in drogstores here in Germany at 8€ for 3 Rolls. When it was originally designed, it was created for general/everyday situations during daylights hours or with an electronic flash.
If you were alive in Hulk Hogan’s heyday, you’ve likely been shot on it.It’s great at what it does, but I do find it a touch too warm for my street photography. Kodak has a great cheat sheet for exposures with Kodak Gold 200 based on the Sunny 16 Rule.If you’re just starting out on your film journey, or if you’re looking for an inexpensive, reliable 35mm, color negative film, Kodak Gold 200 is for you!In open shade, it has a soft, warm, and muted look. The wide exposure latitude made it hard to catastrophically under or overexpose a shot, and the signature warm Kodak tones were ideal for holiday snaps.You can check the current prices and availability through the links below.I think that’s the overriding feeling I get from this stock; that it will always have a connection to those who used to shoot it on family holidays but have since left film photography long behind.The colours are bright without being overbearing or unrealistic, and skin tones come out looking nice and natural. Without a doubt, the Kodak Gold 200 is one of the best 35mm films in the 200 ISO range. Gold 200 also bore the name Kodacolor at that time. For Fujicolor, what we have here is just the regular Fujicolor 100, 200 and 400. Thanks for the question. Bracketing means that you shoot the same image three times: one image overexposed by one stop, one image correctly exposed, and one image underexposed by one stop. I was wondering if you overexpose your shot (shooting Portra 400 at an ISO of 200) do you tell the lab that you shot it at 200 or 400?
It's also useful for indoor, general-lighting picture taking. So if you find some expired Kodak Gold, don’t be afraid to use it.I honestly haven’t had any issues with Kodak Gold 200, but I would suggest avoiding tungsten and florescent lighting situations unless you’re willing to use a filter, which will cause you to lose a stop or two of exposure. That’s because, as a consumer-grade film, it was and still is found at the drug store or the supermarket.I meter it at box speed or 160 ISO, and meter for the shadows or the midtones when using a handheld light meter.Its colors are saturated and rich and tend to be warmer than Fuji consumer films. Only a few specialty labs still process this film, due to the length of discontinuation.