Everything works more or less quickly… That’s really a big thing, because some previous models were really almost unusable and therefore irritating.If you’ve read anything about this camera, you might expect me to mention the Fujifilm’s hyped viewfinder, the ability to switch between the digital viewfinder and the normal optical viewfinder, into which various additional information can be projected, etc …When testing previous models with the new sensor, in some situations, I just did not like the results, they simply did not match my high expectations. These entry-level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. Thanks to its ability to shoot amazing portraits with great bokeh and nice color tones, the combination of great lens and sensor makes it one of the most striking camera in the current market.This series (X100, X100S, X100T) has been for many years a favorite of experienced photographers looking for something small, easy-to-use, and, well, perfect. So it’s possible that the company worked on it during the year, and everything has been fine-tuned in firmware changes.I am trying to avoid the wording “cult camera”, as it usually belongs among tools of of advertising and marketing writers. It does also have an inbuilt digital teleconvertor which does a decent job (JPEGs only, not raw) if there are occasions when you want to zoom in a little. I don't think I'd do a LOT of editing on my photos either. The camera is great for street and people shots... People like the compact retro looks and in my experience are more likely to be relaxed, not reacting the same way as they would with a big zoom lens pointing at them!My (now outdated) Galaxy S8, for instance, when mounted on a tripod with a cheap holder, will take very nice long night exposures; portraits; landscapes, etc. I want a camera that lets me take better photos in low light than what my phone can, but still want something portable that I can fit in a pocket/handbag.
He won Czech Press Photo contest with his photo from Beslan (Russia). i even bring the instax 300 out sometimes to challenge myself to compose better and not worry about 1000 setting options.If one was to recommend an interchangeable lens body as a beginner's camera, I'd strongly suggest going with a decent prime, of what is considered a 'normal' focal length like 35, or 50 (In 35mm terms) at first.Spot on Victoria on all counts.
PLUS, you don't need a cable release, you can set it up to shoot with voice command! Of course, all this works out together with new sensor and great “film simulations” trying (mostly successfully) to imitate old good slide and film materials made by Fuji decade(s) ago…In this sense, the Fujifilm X100F has rescued the reputation of the company in my eyes – I tested it under a variety of conditions, and did not notice any dubious result. These capable cameras costing less than $2000 should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.
I don't think I'd do a LOT of editing on my photos either. We take a look beyond the specs to see what it offers to filmmakers.I also agree on the LX100/2 and would recommend the older and cheaper Fuji X70 as well!Welcome to the forum.